home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
kermit.columbia.edu
/
kermit.columbia.edu.tar
/
kermit.columbia.edu
/
newsgroups
/
misc.20031118-20041115
/
000077_jaltman2@nyc.rr.com_Tue Dec 30 16:13:35 2003.msg
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
2004-11-14
|
2KB
Path: newsmaster.cc.columbia.edu!newsfeed.nyu.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!wn14feed!worldnet.att.net!199.45.49.37!cyclone1.gnilink.net!cyclone.rdc-nyc.rr.com!news-out.nyc.rr.com!twister.nyc.rr.com.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
From: Jeffrey Altman <jaltman2@nyc.rr.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031208
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.kermit.misc
Subject: Re: Problem with increment command
References: <b97068c6.0312241103.2fd8cac7@posting.google.com> <slrnbujr1l.5ig.fdc@sesame.cc.columbia.edu> <b97068c6.0312301053.65dd3301@posting.google.com> <slrnbv3kk9.hit.fdc@sesame.cc.columbia.edu>
In-Reply-To: <slrnbv3kk9.hit.fdc@sesame.cc.columbia.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <FglIb.91780$0P1.32168@twister.nyc.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 20:31:33 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.108.138.151
X-Complaints-To: abuse@rr.com
X-Trace: twister.nyc.rr.com 1072816293 66.108.138.151 (Tue, 30 Dec 2003 15:31:33 EST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 15:31:33 EST
Organization: Road Runner - NYC
Xref: newsmaster.cc.columbia.edu comp.protocols.kermit.misc:14759
Frank da Cruz wrote:
> In article <b97068c6.0312301053.65dd3301@posting.google.com>,
> Kent W. Martin wrote:
> : I couldn't reproduce the problem on my Windows XP Pro workstation
> : because I'm running Kermit95 2.1.3. Today I tried running my test
> : script on my Windows 2000 server's copy of Kermit95 1.1.20. It took
> : less than one minute for the error to occur.
> :
> : I'm now running my test script on my server's copy of Kermit95 2.0.1.
> : This version does not appear to have the same problem.
> :
> : I'm not sure what was changed that affected this portion of the code
> : (this problem is not listed in the list of known bugs) but the problem
> : appears to have been fixed in the latest versions.
> :
> There is no mention of any changes to the INCREMENT command since K95 1.1.20
> in my notes, but of course there have been other fixes in the command parser,
> memory management, etc, to problems that might have affected more than
> one command.
>
> - Frank
The original problem sounds like either a threading problem or some
other memory overwrite issue which was fixed after the release of 1.1.20.